Control your inner Bree if you want to get the top job: copyright ABC |
I read this with delight. I have always championed predictability at work - but then I am someone whose idea of a nightmare is a surprise party. But even more laid back female colleagues like things at work to be organised and structured.
"I love it when a plan comes together" (fanpop.com) |
So if women are in their comfort zone with predictable leadership, why aren't more of us running organisations?
Speaking from my own experience, I suspect we confuse clear predictable leadership with 'office housework'. Joan Williams who writes extensively on women's career issues explores this idea in her most recent book written with her daughter Rachael Dempsey: "What works for Women at Work". She says women are often offered 'office housework' which varies from industry to industry. Employers say this is valued but evidence shows it is not.
In this months' HBR there is an interesting article looking at this trend in the technology industry.
"Office Work vs Glamour Work" copyright HBR |
The article shares evidence that similarly qualified men and women
will be offered roles that bias towards gender expectations – and that they
will seek and accept these roles unconsciously. In high tech companies more men by far are coders – the geeks who
build the software and app that create millions of dollars of value. Similarly qualified women tend to become project
managers. Seen as careful, organized and reliable, they will get things done while mentoring the team along the
way. In principle there’s nothing wrong
with this – providing these roles provide equal access to the top jobs and are
viewed equally in the power and reward hierarchy. But that’s rarely the case. These roles often have a ceiling built in. In fact you easily lock yourself out – the
better you are at delivering on time with everyone you started with working in
careful harmony – the less incentive there is for your employer to let you stop
doing such a great job that is so useful for everyone else and let you loose on
the high risk stuff.
"When a man gives his opinion he's a man. When a woman gives her opinion she's a bitch" - Bette Davis |
Just as I had to accept that if my husband did housework at home he would do things differently to me with different priorities (not easy) and that some things just wouldn't get done, so it should be in the office. Agree basic minimums for a structured workplace that values people. Women care about this and get frustrated and even unhappy if they work in places where this is done badly. But not everything is equally important. Think about things you'll trade on.
I decided not to argue about the way the dishwasher was stacked or what the children had in their packed lunches. At work, it helps to handle things using a project management approach with clear deliverables, a budget and an end date as well as a succession plan so that you don't end up chairing the diversity committee for ever.
Use a dashboard or fact based format to report progress. This allows you to promote your success without bragging which most women hate. I became a devotee of this approach after working with a particularly tough Mckinsey consultant who was a special forces officer in his spare time. 'Structure sets you free' he said. Facts win over emotion in the battle for boardroom power. Facts presented by someone with great communication skills who can explain why the project they're delivering is critical to moving the organisation towards its most important goals is what you're aiming for.